Comments on: Victoria Liss

By: Agnes

Agnes — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:26:57 +0000

Also, there is a whole back story to this that isn’t well known. The man and his girlfriend ordered tacos without beans. When she brought them the wrong order (tacos with beans) he pointed it out. She said to him “you could stand to gain a few pounds”

By: Agnes

Agnes — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:25:25 +0000

I know this is old news but I think it’s important to point out that this waitress is TERRIBLE. Every time i go to the cha cha she is rude and refuses to take orders from people she doesn’t deem hip enough for her time. I’m disgusted by the fact that she hasn’t been fired yet.

By: vir

vir — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:32:36 +0000

If I owned a restaurant and found out that a server had released customer information on the internet, I would fire them and sue in order to protect myself. Leaking privileged information is a legal grey area to some degree but one in which many authority figures are starting to take a hard line. The restaurant could be sued and end up losing a lot of money, if not going out of business, for the behavior of this deranged bar waitress.

By: vir

vir — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:30:33 +0000

Tips, to her, are a right, not something to be earned.

This seems to describe all of society’s parasites. Why give back, or even be constructive, when you can demand?

By: criolle johnny

criolle johnny — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:55:16 +0000

You are simply wrong says
Why don’t you post YOUR home address and phone number on this board and let US do what WE please with it.

By: BSKB

BSKB — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:39:55 +0000

@youarecompletelywrong

You are an idiot.

First, look at the facts we have at hand. This woman is not credible. She has a history of false accusations. Isn’t it entirely reasonable to assume that the basis for her “provocation” is also falsified? Look at that receipt, do you honestly believe that the comment is consistent with the signature? Look at it, the signature style and the comment style are different. Why are you accepting the basic premise from a person proven to have been so seriously wrong on two occasions now?

Also, as a lawyer, I’ll tell you, it doesn’t matter what “message” the writer would have transcribed. There are limitations to what you can say. There are several privacy torts that would cover this matter as well as several statutory ones.

But when it comes down to it, we are discussing the actions of a woman who is perfectly willing to ruin innocent lives over petty insults. If you are siding with her, you have made it pretty clear that you aren’t worthy of serious consideration.

By: crow

crow — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:59:18 +0000

She is not in jail because she is a she.
Like waitresses all over the western world, she is too good to serve her customers.
Tips, to her, are a right, not something to be earned.
She is also not in jail because she is – in her context – normal.

By: Teresa

Teresa — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:47:00 +0000

She is a vile piece of shit: http://goo.gl/f4pXo

By: Ouroboros

Ouroboros — Mon, 17 Oct 2011 02:40:18 +0000

Misdeed or not, he told the *truth*. More and more women are becoming obese and overweight.

Anyways, what she did was 1,000xs worse than what the patron did, albeit in a rude manner, which was telling the truth.

By: vir

vir — Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:16:07 +0000

Victoria Liss had every right to do as she pleased with a personal message written to her on the stationery of the writer’s choosing.

That’s not correct. She does not own that receipt, nor does she own the personal information of that patron. By releasing it, she has wronged both her employer and a customer who had an expectation his privacy rights would be preserved. The fact that she made false accusations in the past, and also has managed to make false identifications since, simply point to her high degree of mental instability.